Enforceability of group agreements
People often ask whether operating agreements are “enforceable.” “Enforceability” should be thought of as the absolute last resort, something you only consider once all your dispute resolution procedures have failed. If you get to that point, you’d take your dispute to small claims court, and whoever the judge is that day will decide whether they think your agreement is reasonable enough to enforce - and that’s usually not who you want to be making decisions about your life. Even if you do take it to court, because it takes so long and so much money to fully go through a trial, most lawsuits end in settlement.
You can short circuit this process yourself by going to a mediator and come out with a similar result in 3 or 4 sessions. A court will give you the same settlement after 3 years and many dollars. It’s in your best interest to have a robust set of dispute resolution systems before anyone resorts to the law. Mediation can be a good option if your intragroup processes are not producing adequate restitution for the harmed party.
Mediation is different from arbitration. An arbitrator is essentially a mini judge, who makes a decision that’s binding on the parties, but without following all the rules that regular judges do. Mediators, on the other hand, help you come to your own decision. They can’t make you do anything.
It’s often a good idea to form a relationship with a mediator at the beginning of your project, before a dispute arises. You want everyone in the group to know and trust them – because they can’t make you agree on anything, they can just help facilitate your own decision.
See Resources for information on how to find a good mediator.